🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a draft bill that include lowering the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “following international suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum one year after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least 50% of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “black market” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for various offences “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia says the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but asserts that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator stated: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that minors should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was contacted for response.